A Local Law to amend the administrative code of the city of New York,
in relation to horse drawn cabs.
The League of Humane Voters of New York City (?LOHV-NYC?), an animal
protection political action committee with 6,000 members citywide, opposes
Intro. No. 44. Intro. No. 44 does no more to help the plight of the horses
and protect human safety than to restrict the operation of horse drawn
cabs to the area inside or immediately adjacent to Central Park and to
place minimal restrictions on their time of operation. The proposed
legislation fails to address the multitude of egregious hazards and
hardships imposed on the horses.
Intro. No. 44 appears only to address the public outcry following a
tragic accident involving the operation of a horse drawn carriage in New
York City?s congested streets. The accident occurred on January 2, 2006
when a horse pulling an empty carriage through Midtown Manhattan was
suddenly startled and dashed down Ninth Avenue, galloping for several
blocks before colliding with a station wagon at 50th Street. The cab
driver was critically injured and taken to the hospital along with the two
passengers of the automobile. The horse, five years old and working among
city traffic for only a few months, was badly injured and later
euthanized. While Intro. No. 44 appears to address the dangers inherent in
horse drawn carriages being operated in NYC?s congested city streets, it
would fail to accomplish even this with regard to the January 2 incident.
In this particular accident, the horse carriage was being driven back to
the stables and not being operated as part of its ordinary business hours.
The proposed legislation does not prohibit the operation of the carriages
to and from the horse stables. With the stables being located anywhere up
to over a mile from Central Park, it is inherently dangerous for the horse
carriages to be operated as long as the stables are maintained in those
distant locals. Barring all new stables being built and maintained in
Central Park itself, an outright ban of the carriage horse industry is the
only measure that would prevent, once and for all, the dangers inherent in
their operation to human and non-human safety.
The Current Law (Section 20-381.1, NYC Administrative Code)
The current law places only the following geographic restrictions on
the operation of horse drawn cabs on New York City streets. While they may
only be driven and operated on the area inside or immediately adjacent to
Central Park in Manhattan between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. on
Mondays through Fridays, the restrictions are far looser at other times,
on Saturdays and Sundays, and very interestingly on holidays such as
Christmas and New Year?s Day. For example, between the hours of 9:00 p.m.
through 11:30 p.m. on Mondays through Fridays, between 12:30 p.m. and
11:30 p.m. on Saturdays, and between 1:30 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. on Sundays,
the horse drawn cabs are restricted only from being driven and operated in
Manhattan on the areas bounded by and including the following streets: on
the north by West Fifty-seventh Street, on the east by Seventh Avenue, on
the south by West Forty-second Street and on the west by Ninth Avenue; and
on the north by West Sixty-fifth Street, on the east by Columbus Avenue,
on the south by West Fifty-seventh Street and on the west by Amsterdam
The Purpose of Intro. No. 44
Intro. No. 44 serves the very limited purpose of addressing the streets
on which horse drawn cabs may be operated, restricting it to the area
inside or immediately adjacent to Central Park in Manhattan. The intent of
the proposed legislation, introduced by Council Member Avella, is
indicated as being warranted in the interests of public safety and
LOHV-NYC?s Reasons for Opposing Intro. No. 44
While Intro. No. 44 appears, on its face, to make a laudable attempt to
prevent traffic accidents, as the one described above, it would not have
prevented this accident and the loss of the horse Spotty?s life since
Spotty was pulling the carriage back to the stable post operation, just as
it will not safeguard our streets from similar accidents involving
transport to and from the stables to the Park.
LOHV-NYC opposes Intro. No. 44 not for what safeguards it attempts to
propose but for those it fails to propose. First and foremost, Intro. No.
44 fails even in its clear singular purpose because it does not propose
that the industry?s horses be housed in stables built and cited in Central
Park. It makes no recommendation for any changes to the location of the
five current stables on the West Side from 37th to 52nd Street.
More importantly, Intro. No. 44. fails to address fully or even
remotely the multitude of egregious concerns described below.
New York City is undoubtedly one of the most traffic congested cities
in the United States. Carriage horses are simply out of place in midtown?s
congested streets, belonging to earlier era when there were far fewer
vehicles and pedestrians. Placing horse drawn carriages with the City?s
cars, taxis, busses, emergency vehicles, bikes and pedestrians is a recipe
for disaster. In recent years, there have been many accidents where both
horses and humans have been seriously injured or died and property
damaged. Contrary to operators? claims, most horses are not at all
comfortable working among cars and trucks. Horses can be easily ?spooked?
no matter how well trained they may be. They may become startled by sudden
noises like siren, horns, motorcycles and thunder, and cause accidents by
panicking and running into traffic or onto sidewalks.
The nostalgia associated with the image of horse buggies drawn on dirt
and/or cobblestone roads, and the simpler life associated with these
times, whether actual or imagined, is a common and understandable emotion,
but is clearly out of synch with today?s reality. While we yearn for the
past or at least its small token reminders, life it is not what was in the
days when horse drawn buggies were a necessary and regular mode of
transportation, and the horses are plainly out of place amidst NYC?s busy
and dangerous roads.
Unhealthy and Inhumane Conditions
In longing for yesterday, people romanticize and yearn to preserve a
little bit of what used to be. While this is a beautiful and sentimental
notion, it is doubtful that if people genuinely knew the cruelty and
suffering inflicted upon and endured by the horses, they would continue to
consider horse buggies charming and long for the preservation of the
industry. Carriage horses do not lead joyous and healthy lives. Should
that have been even minimally a concern of the industry, advocates pleas
for time and space to be allocated in Central Park or elsewhere for the
horses to run and play freely would have answered. Instead, the horses
live very short depressing and unhealthy lives. Because of their previous
uses on racetracks or on Amish farms, many of the horses come into the
industry with preexisting injuries or arthritis and are forced to pull
carriages containing heavy loads ? upwards of 700 ? 800 pounds. When these
horses are no longer fit to work (generally lasting only 4 years in the
industry, as opposed to police horses who generally last about 14 years),
they are ?retired? and generally sold off at auction, often being bought
to be taken to the slaughterhouse and sold as a delicacy to European
countries or used as dog food.
Some of the harsh circumstances that describe the bane of the horses?
existence and the reason for their early demise are described below.
The smoke and exhaust fumes from urban traffic are dangerous for the
horses. With their nostrils being usually only 3 to 3 ? feet above street
level, the horses are in a direct line with vehicle tailpipes, naturally
resulting in respiratory impairment. And, as a consequence of the horses
constantly walking and standing on hard streets, lameness and hoof
deterioration occur. Problems, such as this, are exacerbated by many
carriage owners? and drivers? incapability of recognizing a horse?s
lameness or their unwillingness to suffer financial loss by removing a
horse from service even temporarily to restore its health. Owners/drivers?
lack of attention to the physical care-taking of the horses is also
evidenced by their use of ill-fitting harnesses which cause skin sores,
bone bruising, and neck, shoulder and back problems, and their use of
cruel bits which cause painful mouth, teeth and gum problems. Weather
conditions pose another drastic and sometimes fatal danger to the horses.
Horses must work in hot humid temperatures and in the brutal cold up to
nine hours a day, seven days a week and then return to stuffy filthy
stables where they have no opportunity for turnout. In summer months,
horses suffering from dehydration or heatstroke can die in just a few
hours. While NYC prohibits the operation of carriage horses at certain
extreme temperatures, the temperature reading is very often significantly
lower than the scorching hot temperature of the streets (bearing directly
on the horses? hooves and bodies).
Impossible to Adequately Enforce
It is impossible to adequately enforce the laws governing carriage
horses. Although the NYC Police Department and the Department of Health
and Consumer Affairs share responsibility for their enforcement, along
with other animal protection legislation, with the American Society for
the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (?ASPCA?), the primary enforcement
responsibility falls to the ASPCA. Significantly, the ASPCA?s Humane Law
enforcement Program is funded through private donations and not by the
City of New York. With only 21 agents, the ASPCA simply lacks the manpower
and resources to work on the vast animal cruelty issues all over the City
(and sometimes throughout the state of New York, since it has
jurisdictional powers over the state). With over 68 carriages and 200
horses and 360 drivers, the ASPCA?s few agents clearly cannot ensure that
the drivers are obeying the laws.
The waste from the horses on the streets and in the Park causes a large
sanitation problem. Even when the horses are not lined up for business on
Central Park South, the pervasive smell of horse urine and feces pervades
this area and to a lesser extent the Park roads where millions of New
Yorkers and tourists flock to enjoy the Park?s beauty and recreational
Very simply, based on all the hardships inflicted upon carriage horses
described herein and many more not even mentioned in the confines of this
brief memo, the carriage horse industry exploits animals in the sake of
entertainment. As with plainly immoral institutions, it must be dismantled
regardless of the economic impact.
In Conclusion ?
LOHV-NYC opposes Intro. No. 44 for because it does very little in the
way of safeguarding future traffic accidents and virtually nothing to
improve the welfare of the animals exploited by the industry. LOHV-NYC
encourages the full City Council to oppose this legislation and to work
with organizations such as ours and their constituents to promote a
reverence for life and bring about meaningful change. I thank you
personally for your attention to our members and supporters?, and what we
expect to be a majority of the NYC?s population, deeply held views on this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this issue, please do not
hesitate to contact our office at (212) 889-0303.
Lisa Virgona, Esq.
Board President and Legal Counsel
Return to NEWS
Your Comments are Welcome